![\"\"](\"https:\/\/fintex.ch\/wp1\/\/home\/clients\/e31005f27d09b0c1b099017aa5f43223\/web\/wp1\/wp-content\/uploads\/\/EMIR_REFIT_2.jpg\")
<\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Didn’t you get a headache wondering how to populate Field 2.4 “Subsequent Position UTI”? The complexity comes from the fact that EMIR REFIT has introduced dependencies between reports. For example, some particular types of transactions such as novation or compression must refer to the UTI of the initial transaction. Similarly, the \u201cInclusion in a Position\u201d concept, which is almost generalized for ETDs, imposes that any transaction must refer to the UTI of the position in which it is included. A potential difficulty for those who have to aggregate data (transactions and positions) from different information systems. Factor:y by FinTeX relies on a comprehensive and normalized data model which makes this kind of obstacle much easier to overcome!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":true,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ub_ctt_via":"","iawp_total_views":36,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21,20],"tags":[16,15,18,24,22,17,25,23,19],"class_list":["post-1369","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-emir","category-regulatory-reporting","tag-emir","tag-emirrefit","tag-portfoliocode","tag-refit","tag-regulatorycompliance","tag-regulatoryreporting","tag-transactionreporting","tag-upi","tag-uti"],"featured_image_src":null,"author_info":{"display_name":"Cyril DARBO","author_link":"https:\/\/fintex.ch\/wp1\/author\/cyril\/"},"yoast_head":"\n